• Print

THN.com Playoff Blog: Lay off Hockey Night in Canada

Bob Cole, play-by-play commentator, and on-air personality and former Team Canada player Cassie Campbell of both get their share of criticism for their work on HNIC. (Photo by Jana Chytilova/NHLI via Getty Images)

Zoom Image

Bob Cole, play-by-play commentator, and on-air personality and former Team Canada player Cassie Campbell of both get their share of criticism for their work on HNIC. (Photo by Jana Chytilova/NHLI via Getty Images)

You know what really grinds my gears?

Here we are, at the very best time of the NHL season, surrounded with playoff hockey – a whole new level of the game – at every turn. Whether you like the free-flowing, out-in-the-open style of the Nashville-Detroit series, or the shutdown, hard-hitting style of the San Jose-Calgary matchup, there is something for every hockey fan.

And, yet, there are still complaints raining in about Hockey Night in Canada, the premiere hockey production.

Biased coverage.

Don Cherry is a hot-air-filled loud mouth.

Bob Cole can’t keep up with the play.

P.J. Stock, the bubble boy, is uninformed and irrelevant.

Give it a rest. Next thing you know people will be complaining how the Foster Hewitt voiceover welcomes the hockey fans from Canada and Newfoundland (which wasn't part of the country at that time), but not Quebec or any other province, in the opening sequence.

The fact of the matter is, HNIC is the best of the best, the cream of the crop, the hockey fan’s weekly spiritual gathering, if you will.

Cherry is the lightning rod of criticism on the show. However, those who gripe about Grapes can just as easily a) leave the room and re-stock refreshments, b) change the channel to another game, c) turn the television off, or even d) watch the first intermission every other night with a more toned-down Kelly Hrudey – who also does a fabulous job.

It’s not as if Cherry dominates the show folks.

I’ve never understood why you would sit through something that just irritates you and then complain about it to everyone else. This is why I steer clear of Big Brother and Fox News. I could watch it and complain, but I could also watch something I actually enjoy.

Then there’s the newest whipping boy on the block: P.J. Stock.

Stock looks like he really enjoys doing what he does. He updates us and even makes us laugh from time to time, albeit sometimes for the silly remarks he makes. And his toe-to-toe battle with Al Strachan on the Hotstove April 12 was hilarious (watch it HERE).

Would you rather have, oh I don’t know, a monotone, completely unbiased Dan Rather updating us instead? Can you imagine?

“Breaking news from Washington tonight. Joffrey Lupul scored in overtime to eliminate the Capitals. Crowds litter the ice with garbage in frustration. The full story after 40 minutes.”

Related Links

And who cares if Stock or Cherry say something to support one team over another. Cherry used to coach Boston, so of course his heart is still there. A lot of Canadiens fans don’t like him anyway, so when your team beats his, it just gives you more ammo to throw back at “the suit.”

These guys are former players/coaches, not career journalists. They add the pizzazz, insight and entertainment that makes HNIC so great. I want outspoken, off-the-wall guys like this and not an anchor reading a teleprompter from behind a desk.

Cole also draws the ire of viewers. Sure, he doesn’t always have the most intriguing commentary, but does anyone else tune into CBC to watch the game besides me? I know who has the puck by looking at the screen and following the game. The announcer is simply background sound that flows with the game.

And Cole most certainly does flow with the game. His old school sound resonates through the TV speakers much like Foster Hewitt’s distant voice crackled over the radio airwaves. He doesn’t sound like a video game or someone who is more apt to calling basketball. What ever happened to tradition? HNIC is tradition. Bob Cole is tradition.

If Don Cherry wearing a Bruins tie, P.J. Stock cracking a lame joke, or Bob Cole calling out a mispronounced name from high up in the gondola from time to time bothers you, please, stop all this blasphemy and turn the sound down or change the channel.

For every whiny Canadian who complains about the tiniest of things on the greatest hockey production to ever be welcomed into a living room, there are five American fans wishing they were not bound to NBC, Versus or FSN.

THN.com's Playoff Blogs, featuring analysis and opinion on the action from the night before, with insight on what happened and what it all means going forward, will appear daily throughout the NHL playoffs. Read more entries HERE.

Rory Boylen is THN.com's web content specialist. His blog appears Thursdays.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.

COMMENTS (58)

Sort: Oldest | Newest    Filter: All | Videos


Jeff Posted
(2009-04-30 07:37:03)



Living in Japan, we seldom can watch hockey. Fortunately wth nhl.com providing coverage, this season I am watching hockey again and loving it. Growing up in Montreal, Hockey Night in Canada was Danny Gallivan, Dick Irvin, and others. Naturally, I appreciated their voices and calling of games, however Bob Cole has always been great and I've always appreciated Harry Neale's wit. He's now doing Sabres games. With the emergence of TSN in the 80's, Canadians were able to hear new talent with Jim Hughson; who's fabulous, Russ Romaniuk; especially with the Juniors, and others. I agree with someone about Chris Cuthbert; he brings great energy to every broadcast, and I recently heard him calling a Calgary-Edmonton game. I suppose living in North America, people have lots of oppurtunities to watch games, and if you are overseas, you should consider buying a season subcription with nhl.com, as it provides live coverage of almost every game and you get to hear new voices from every NHL city. A Habs game I watched in Columbus a couple of months ago had the house rocking! Wild fans on the other hand seemed a bit tame.
    0



Dave Posted
(2009-04-30 06:15:39)



The point of the broadcast, as far as I'm concerned, is to show the game. The colour commentators seem to think the broadcast is their personal PVR. A few years ago, in response to a question about how the "hurry up" faceoff rule would affect the game, Gary Bettman replied "You'll have to show one fewer replay." Instead, we get 3 to 4 after every goal, check, or whatever else strikes the colour man's fancy. The director seems to think that faceoffs are optional, and that a player leaving the ice is unusual enough that we should watch. In defence of Bob Cole, who could work with Greg Millen squeaking incessantly in their ear? And if you don't think that good play-by-play can enhance a game, then you've never heard Jiggs MacDonald, Foster Hewitt, Danny Gallivan, et al, and I pity you. The producer of this mess seems to think that the target audience is a bunch of crack-ravaged mongooses (mongeese?) that wants to see the illegitimate offspring of a video game and hockey card collection. If there were a broadcast that just showed the game from centre and only had crowd noise, I'd sign up in a second. Instead, I've just stopped watching. I miss it, though.
    0



Jed Posted
(2009-04-30 06:15:26)



I agree with Deborah Barclay, P.J. Stock has got to go. The guy can barely speak. It's difficult watching him as he yells and stumbles over just about every word that comes out of his mouth. Is he nervous? Back to the minors for P.J., he's not quite ready for primetime.
    0



Deborah Barclay Posted
(2009-04-30 06:15:23)



Having listened to yet another of P.J. Stock's "screams", I just had to write in. I'm sure they're trying to balance Don Cherry with someone young and hip but please! He's brash, vapid and unintelligible while delivering his rant at top volume. I had never heard of him before and I hope, after these playoffs, not to hear from him again! D Barclay
    0



Jarrod Olson Posted
(2009-04-30 06:14:12)



I like how everyone here is a ratings expert. I didn't know that there were that many Nielson boxes out there monitoring Montreal sports programming. RDS will never be bigger than CBC because it caters to only one market and does not have national reach, so comparing the two is moot. I'm not the biggest fan of Bob Cole or Greg Millen, or Harry Neale but he seems to have been demoted. But HNIC is what we've got and it's not that bad. I like the fact that they have a good balance between professionalism and enthusiasm. Stock has been a good addition because he balances out a guy like Eliot Friedman, who seems to have no personality at all. But it's better than watching TSN an listening to Mike Milbury or Glen Healy. If you stay up to watch the late games, Jim Hughson and Craig Simpson are an entertaining bunch. And lay off Cherry. Everyone likes to say they're an expert, but they either have no idea what they're talking about (see Healy), or they are fence sitters. Its good to see someone with convictions. If you don't want to watch him, go get a beer or some nachos or something. It's not like he's on in the middle of the game.
    0



BJ Levine Posted
(2009-04-30 06:14:10)



The only people with think CBC is still the "Cream of the crop" have never watched a game on RDS. Pierre Houde is to Bob Cole what Bill Clinton is to Grampa Simpson
    0



Jeff Kelly Posted
(2009-04-30 06:14:10)



Hey Rory nice story? I have watched HNIC for 40 years.I still love it.Probably will kill me someday from the stress of losing in overtime of a game seven.You are wrong ,people who watch this show religously have a right to complain. We have to listen to Don complain,this is what 75 percent of his show is complaining.My question to you is ,isn't that why Don is there?To create controversy? Oh and by the way I hate it when Don goes on about the Bruins.I still have the show tuned in.Its entertaining just to see what goofy suit he might be wearing.GO HABS GO.
    0



Arthur Lanecki Posted
(2009-04-30 06:14:08)



Mr.Boylen, Your title for this blog should have been ' Don Cherry and Bob Cole have no business being on Hockey Night in Canada '. Cherry is an absolute clown who should have been off the air a long,long time ago. He has nothing good to contribute to the show. Whoever keeps him at CBC must be of the same elk. If these two buffons were FIRED, no one would hire them. And your suggestions,such as, change channel.....ect. and to think I, we pay them, makes my blood boil. CBC FIRE THEM!!
    0



Nicholas Posted
(2009-04-30 06:14:04)



2 years ago, I finally got fed up and changed the channell. As a Habs fan, it was worth the $3 a month to order RDS and listen in french to every game the Canadiens played rather than suffer through the alternative, which is the god awful commentary by Bob Cole with bitter Don Cherry leading the anti-Habs charge. Hockey Night in Canada used to be a celebration of all things hockey in Canada. I rarely missed a HNIC telecast growing up, and it's too bad that long time fans of what used to be the pinnacle of hockey productions have to find new means of following their favorite Canadian team. But as a proud supporter of RDS now, I couldn't be happier with the fact that CBC is getting trounced in the ratings due to their inability to properly support all 6 Canadian teams. Go Canadiens Go!!
    0



Alain Thibault Posted
(2009-04-30 06:14:00)



Ha c'mon! The Only way you can like Pierre Houde or enjoy RDS is if you don't understand French!
    0



1 2 3 4 5 6

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Register or Login to submit a comment
Player/Injury News - Up to the Minute NHL Updates This Week - Subscribe Now

Who should start in goal for Russia at the Olympics?






THN Newsletter - Sign Up Now

“I was coming in to take the boards away and had some good jump. He bobbled the puck at the last second and I don’t think he saw me coming at all. It was a shoulder right in his chest. He’s eight feet tall, so it’s not like you could hit him in the head.”

- Ottawa's Chris Neil about a hit he threw on Tampa's Victor Hedman Thursday night, causing Hedman to leave the game.

Our Partners