Skip to main content Blog: Time to eliminate no-trade clauses

The Hockey News

The Hockey News

The NHL introduced a salary cap to protect foolish, free spending GMs from themselves. Review some of the contracts that have been handed out since and debate whether or not you think it has worked to expectations.

When the league and the NHL Players’ Association get together for future talks, I suggest Gary Bettman and Co. push for the elimination – or, at the very least, a reduction – of no-trade/no-movement clauses in contracts. Some GMs hand them out like Halloween treats.

You could even make the case giving out these clauses is a big reason why recently fired Toronto Maple Leafs GM John Ferguson lost his job.

Ferguson effectively painted himself – and his replacement – into a corner by giving a no-trade/no-movement contract to defenseman Bryan McCabe and including no-trade clauses in deals he initialed with Mats Sundin and Darcy Tucker.

Ferguson also gave limited no-trade clauses to defensemen Tomas Kaberle (if the Leafs miss the playoffs in 2008 or 2009 he can be traded the following year without his permission) and Pavel Kubina (can be traded to pre-specified teams).

Look at the mess Tampa Bay GM Jay Feaster has created after including no-trade clauses in the contracts of Brad Richards and Martin St-Louis. The Lightning is wallowing near the bottom of the NHL this season with three of the best forwards in the league (including Vinny Lecavalier) and Feaster can do very little to help his team’s desperate need for better defense and goaltending because St-Louis and Richards – the two most likely to be moved – need to give permission to be dealt.

The salary cap limits player movement. Of course we’ll see plenty of transactions at the trade deadline, but by then teams like Toronto and Tampa Bay will be virtually dead in terms of this year’s playoff picture. Wonder if that would be the case if Toronto could have traded Tucker or McCabe in November and Tampa could have swapped Richards or St-Louis in December?

At the very least, teams should be limited in the number of players they can give no-trade clauses to. For instance, if Pittsburgh wants to give one to Sidney Crosby, no problem. But give one to Darryl Sydor or Sergei Gonchar, which they did? Forget it.

I favor eliminating them altogether.

Mike Brophy, the co-author of the book Walking with Legends, is a senior writer for The Hockey News and a regular contributor on His blog appears Mondays and his column, Double OT, appears Wednesday.

For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, Subscribe to The Hockey News magazine.


Jake Oettinger

Why Short-Term Deals Are Better Gambles for NHL Goalies

Adam Proteau argues that the consequences of signing a goalie long-term can hurt a franchise much more than gambling on a short-term contract.

Andrei Kuzmenko

Andrei Kuzmenko Shines in a Conflicting Canucks Season

Andrei Kuzmenko turned his career year in the KHL into an NHL contract. As Tony Ferrari explores, he's now showing promise as a strong two-way forward.

Frank Boucher, Bill Cook, Bun Cook

From the Archives: The Rangers World Premiere in 1926

Madison Square Garden wanted their own NHL team to capitalize on the popularity of New York's original squad. As Stan Fischler details, the Rangers were born.