Skip to main content

Lou Eriksson's six-year, $36-million deal once again shows Canucks have no identity

Loui Eriksson is a good signing from a pure hockey standpoint, but does he fit the Canucks' current direction? It's anyone's guess.
The Hockey News

The Hockey News

Did left winger Loui Eriksson have an excellent bounce-back year in Boston? Absolutely. Is he worth $6 million a year? Probably. Might he fit beautifully shifting to the right wing on a line with Henrik and Daniel Sedin? Sure. But does it make any sense for the current incarnation of the Vancouver Canucks to sign Eriksson, who turns 31 July 17, to a six-year deal? One again, the Jim Benning regime shows its personality is multiple personalities, a blend of buy and sell, of rebuild and playoff push, of acceptance and denial. To try and break down what this team has done over the past few seasons, here's a rough sketch…


Sign Radim Vrbata for $5-million AAV

Sign Ryan Miller for $6-million AAV

Trade Zack Kassian for Brandon Prust

Trade Jared McCann for Erik Gudbranson

Re-sign Derek Dorsett at $2.65-million AAV

Re-sign Luca Sbisa at $3.6-million AAV

Do not trade pending UFAs Vrbata and Dan Hamhuis for future assets at 2016 deadline

Trade Hunter Shinkaruk for Markus Granlund Sign Loui Eriksson at $6-million AAV


Trade Ryan Kesler to Anaheim for Sbisa, Nick Bonino and picks

Trade Jason Garrison to Tampa Bay fro a second-round pick

Trade Kevin Bieksa to Anaheim for a second-round pick

Draft McCann, Jake Virtanen, Brock Boeser and Olli Juolevi in first round of past three drafts

Trade Eddie Lack to Carolina for two draft picks The Canucks have missed the playoffs twice in the past three years. The Sedins turn 36 in September. Their contracts expire after 2017-18, so they'll be 38 when (if?) they commence their next deals. The Canucks will have four more years of Eriksson at $6 million by then, and he'll be 33. It's nothing against Eriksson, as he's a very nice fit in the short-term. But can anyone explain the Canucks' vision right now? It seems like they're stocking the cupboard with prospects while simultaneously loading up on expensive veteran talent. This team doesn't know who it wants to be.

WHAT ADVANCED STATS SAY: Huge term for a guy about to turn 31, but unlike the Backes, Lucic, and Ladds of the world, Eriksson should age much better thanks to a less hard-nosed approach to the game. The dollar figure is $2 million more than expected, but Eriksson’s projection was admittedly the most head-scratching of

Cane’s model projections. Vancouver was one of the worst possession teams in the league last season, and signing Eriksson should mitigate that in a big way. He’s a huge possession driver, especially on the defensive end of the ice. As good as he is though, it’s a strange course of action for a team that should probably be rebuilding instead.

By Dominik Luszczyszyn

Matt Larkin is a writer and editor at The Hockey News and a regular contributor to the Post-To-Post blog. For more great profiles, news and views from the world of hockey, subscribe to The Hockey News magazine. Follow Matt Larkin on Twitter at @THNMattLarkin

The Hockey News

The Hockey News


Jason Spezza and Kyle Dubas

Fischler Report: The Genius of Kyle Dubas

Stan Fischler takes a look at Vic Hadfield's diary's impact on the Canada 72 Summit Series, the genius of Toronto Maple Leafs GM Kyle Dubas, yays and boos, and everything in between.

The Hockey News

2022-23 Fantasy Hockey Outlook: Tampa Bay Lightning

We know better than to count out the Lightning even though they lost key veterans for the second straight summer due to a cap crunch. Here's a look at who remains.

Jake Sanderson

NHL Rebuild Review: Ottawa Senators

Tony Ferrari does a deep dive into how the Senators went from the bottom of the standings to having one of the more promising young groups in the league today.