Technically, reverse hits in the NHL are not against the rules, but there was a time when headshots weren't, either, says Ken Campbell. Oliver Ekman-Larsson [https://thehockeynews.com/.image/c_fit,h_600,w_600/MjEwMTcyMzA4NTM3NDg0MzE5/usatsi_24552582_168400847_lowres.jpg] Oliver Ekman-Larsson Had Oliver Ekman-Larsson's reverse hit [https://thehockeynews.com/news/ex-nhl-players-debate-whether-leafs-ekman-larsson-deserved-fine-for-reverse-hit] on Jake Guentzel Monday night not been correctly penalized as interference, it would have been considered a clean hit by NHL standards. But should it? The reverse hit, like having to fight after administering a clean hit [https://thehockeynews.com/news/hey-remember-when-nhl-players-could-take-a-hit-without-fighting], is something that has crept into the game in the past 10 to 15 years. Niklas Kronwall, formerly of the Detroit Red Wings, was a master at it. But they are potentially dangerous hits for a couple of reasons. The first is the guy being hit has no idea that it's coming. Second, you're usually dealing with a guy who is leaving his feet. It's something that has become weaponized over the years. Is it time the NHL looked at penalizing these kinds of hits? Here's more in today's video column, which includes a discussion of what some GMs said on the issue: Technically, reverse hits in the NHL are not against the rules, but there was a time when headshots weren't, either, says Ken Campbell. (Don't see the video? Click here [https://thehockeynews.com/video/should-the-nhl-penalize-all-reverse-hits].) Place your vote at our forum: Should the NHL penalize all reverse hits? [https://thehockeynews.roundtable.io/THNHOME/posts/6bKu4gA9ZkMFBBDdctP4] Get the latest news and trending stories right to your inbox by subscribing to The Hockey News newsletter here [https://info.thehockeynews.com/mail/microsites/951/1/gTeQVf?_gl=1*ustlbj*_ga*NjkyMzUxMy4xNjYzNjIwMzQ3*_ga_PK63FB1PME*MTcxMzUwOTExNi40NDguMS4xNzEzNTA5MjA5LjU5LjAuMA..].
