Powered by Roundtable
IanKennedy@THNews profile imagefeatured creator badge
Ian Kennedy
Jun 16, 2025
Partner

Gaining puck possession is a crucial aspect of the sport. Players who can consistently come away from a puck battle, face-off dot, or on retrieval help turn the tides shift after shift for their team. 

There's a strong group of NCAA players heading to the 2025 PWHL Draft who fit this bill. Here's a look at some of those specific scenarios, and the advanced statistics showing NCAA leaders among the PWHL Draft class.

Puck Battles %#

When the puck is along the boards, in a scrum, or loose when two or more players are competing for possession, it's a "puck battle." Coaches at all levels will preach about being hard on pucks, and winning one-on-one battles. This puck battle percentage shows the rate at which a player who engages in a puck battle wins, and comes away with possession. It can be considered a sign of strength, stick skills, body positioning, and compete. Here's a look at the top puck battle performers in the NCAA class.

  1. Dayle Ross, D, St. Cloud State – 65.8%
  2. Nina Jobst-Smuth, D, Minnesota-Duluth – 63.2%
  3. Rory Guilday, D, Cornell – 62%
  4. Keri Clougherty, D, Boston College – 61.3%
  5. Evelyne Blais-Savoie, D, Vermont - 59.9%
  6. Olivia Muhn, D, Yale – 59.7%
  7. Lyndie Lobdell, D, Penn State – 59.4%
  8. Haley Winn, D, Clarkson – 58.9%
  9. Kendall Cooper, D, Quinnipiac – 58.2%
  10. Riley Brengman, D, Ohio State – 58.1%
  11. Julia Shaunessy, D, Boston University – 57.8%
  12. Hanna Baskin, D, Minnesota-Duluth – 57.7%
  13. Nicole Gosling, D, Clarkson – 57.3%
  14. Mia Biotti, D, Harvard – 56.7%
  15. Karley Garcia, D, Penn State – 56.5%
  16. Jenna Buglioni, F, Ohio State – 55.6%
  17. Vita Ponyatovskaia, D, Yale – 55.2%
  18. Brooke Becker, D, Providence – 55.0%
  19. Brianna Brooks, F, Penn State – 54.8%
  20. Emily Zumwinkle, D, Ohio State - 54.3%

Puck Retrievals After Shots#

On the attack, regaining the puck after a shot is crucial to maintain possession and pressure. It's like a rebound in basketball. The PRAS score per game shows how often a specific player retrieves one of these shots, and we also adjusted this stat for time on ice, because a player who inherently gets more time on ice should have more retrievals making the adjusted PRAS/60 a better predictor of a player's effectiveness in retrievals after shots.

  1. Jenna Buglioni, F, Ohio State – 3.62 (9.57 PRAS/60)
  2. Anne Cherkwoski, F, Clarkson – 3.38 (8.48 PRAS/60)
  3. Vanessa Upson, F, Mercyhurst – 3.35 (9.31 PRAS/60)
  4. Lily Delianedis, F, Cornell – 3.15 (10.29 PRAS/60)
  5. Haley Winn, D Clarkson – 3.08 (5.81 PRAS/60)
  6. Nicole Gosling, D, Clarkson – 2.95 (5.91 PRAS/60)
  7. Laura Fuoco, F, Dartmouth – 2.89 (7.32 PRAS/60)
  8. Peyton Hemp, F, Minnesota – 2.86 (9.37 PRAS/60)
  9. Kira Juodikis, F, New Hampshire – 2.83 (7.91 PRAS/60)
  10. Morgan Neitzke, F, Lindenwood – 2.81 (7.41 PRAS/60)
  11. Kristyna Kaltounkova, F, Colgate – 2.76 (6.90 PRAS/60)
  12. Olivia Wallin, F, Minnesota-Duluth – 2.76 (7.21 PRAS/60)
  13. Ella Huber, F, Minnesota – 2.74 (7.42 PRAS/60)
  14. Brynn Saarela, F, Syracuse – 2.74 (6.96 PRAS/60)
  15. Skylar Irving, F, Northeastern – 2.70 (7.59 PRAS/60)
  16. Maya Labad, F, Quinnipiac – 2.68 (8.53 PRAS/60)
  17. Nina Jobst-Smith, D, Minnesota-Duluth – 2.66 (6.47 PRAS/60)
  18. Brianna Brooks, F, Penn State – 2.65 (8.19 PRAS/60)
  19. Clara Van Wieren, F, Minnesota-Duluth – 2.65 (6.61 PRAS/60)
  20. Kylie Aquaro, F, RIT – 2.58 (8.46 PRAS/60)

Takeaways Versus Puck Losses Per Game#

In the real world people say to give more than you take. In hockey, you need to takeaway the puck more than you give it away. Players who have a positive takeaway to puck loss ratio do just that. Here's a look at the top takeaway to puck loss ratios from the NCAA cohort entering the PWHL Draft.

  1. Dayle Ross, D, St. Cloud State – 2.21
  2. Karley Gacria, D, Penn State – 2.19
  3. Rory Guilday, D, Cornell – 2.08
  4. Kendall Cooper, D, Quinnipiac – 2.04
  5. Nicole Gosling, D, Clarkson – 1.98
  6. Haley Winn, D Clarkson – 1.90
  7. Olivia Muhn, D, Yale – 1.83
  8. Julia Shaunessy, D, Boston University – 1.82
  9. Vita Ponyatovsaia, D, Yale – 1.81
  10. Mia Tsilemos, D, RIT – 1.79
  11. Hanna Baskin, D, Minnesota-Duluth 1.70
  12. Tamara Giaquinto, D, Boston University – 1.69
  13. Lyndie Lobdell, D Penn State – 1.63
  14. Ava Rinker, D, Connecticut – 1.55
  15. Nina Jobst-Smith, D, Minnesota-Duluth – 1.49
  16. Brooke Becker, D, Providence – 1.47
  17. Riley Brengman, D, Ohio State – 1.47

Defensive Zone Face-Offs (Total Taken / Win %) (Minimum 120 Draws)#

Offensive zone starts and defensive zone starts play a key role in a player's ability to produce. While getting more offensive zone starts is advantageous, seeing a player utilized for defensive zone responsibilities is something PWHL teams will covet. Here's a look at the top draft eligible centres when it comes to defensive zone draws.

  1. Kristyna Kaltounkova, C, Colgate – 205 / 66.8%
  2. Ella Huber, C, Minnesota – 123 / 60.2%
  3. Casey O’Brien, C, Wisconsin – 255 / 56.9%
  4. Maddy Samoskevich, C/D, Quinnipiac – 160 / 56.9%
  5. Skylar Irving, C, Northeastern – 192 / 56.8%
  6. Brianna Brooks, C, Penn State – 140 / 55.7%
  7. Anna Segedi, C, Colgate – 247 / 55.1%
  8. Lily Delianedis, C, Cornell – 201 / 51.2%
  9. Lauren Messier, C, Dartmouth - 234 / 50.9%
  10. Evelyne Blais-Savoie, C, Vermont - 209 / 49.8%

Face-offs (Total Taken / Win %) (Minimum 250 Draws)#

  1. Kristyna Kaltounkova, C, Colgate – 735 / 66.0%
  2. Casey O’Brien, C, Wisconsin – 822 / 62.3%
  3. Peyton Hemp, C, Minnesota – 266 / 60.5%
  4. Brianna Brooks, C, Penn State – 588 / 58.2%
  5. Natalie Mlynkova, C, Minnesota – 395 / 58.2%
  6. Anna Segedi, C, Colgate – 678 / 58.0%
  7. Ella Huber, C, Minnesota – 709 / 56.1%
  8. Skylar Irving, C, Northeastern – 579 / 55.6%
  9. Maddy Samoskevich, C/D, Quinnipiac - 633 / 55.5%
  10. Vanessa Upson, C, Mercyhurst - 750 / 54.5%